4.7 Article

Differential expression of granzymes A and B in human cytotoxic lymphocyte subsets and T regulatory cells

期刊

BLOOD
卷 104, 期 9, 页码 2840-2848

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0859

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI37618] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [5T32-HD-43010] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 49786] Funding Source: Medline
  4. PHS HHS [5T32H007499] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and natural killer (NK) cells use the perforin/granzyme pathway as a major mechanism to kill pathogen-containing cells and tumor cells.' 2 Dysregulation of this pathway results in several human diseases, such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Here we characterize the single-cell expression pattern of granzymes A and B in human lymphocytes using a flow cytometry-based assay. We demonstrate that most circulating CD56(+)8(-) NK cells, and approximately half of circulating CD8(+) T lymphocytes, coexpressed both granzymes A and B. In contrast, few circulating CD4(+) T lymphocytes expressed granzymes A or B. Activation of CD8(+) T lymphocytes with concanavalin A (ConA)/interleukin-2 (IL-2), and activation of CD4(+) T lymphocytes with antibodies to CD3/CD28 or CD3/CD46 (to generate T regulatory [Tr1] cells), induced substantial expression of granzyme B, but not granzyme A. Naive CD4(+)CD45RA(+) cells stimulated with antibodies to CD3/CD46 strongly expressed granzyme B, while CD3/CD28 stimulation was ineffective. Finally, we show that granzyme B-expressing CD4(+) TO cells are capable of killing target cells in a perforin-dependent, but major histocompatibility complex (MHC)/T-cell receptor (TCR)-independent, manner. Our results demonstrate discordant expression of granzymes A and B in human lymphocyte subsets and T regulatory cells, which suggests that different granzymes may play unique roles in immune system responses and regulation. (C) 2004 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据