4.7 Article

Coomparative study of methods for determining vascular permeability and blood volume in human gliomas

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 748-757

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20182

关键词

dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI; brain tumor; permeability measurements; blood-brain barrier; perfusion imaging; cerebral blood volume

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To characterize human gliomas using T-1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), and directly compare three pharmacokinetic analysis techniques: a conventional established technique and two novel techniques that aim to reduce erroneous overestimation of the volume transfer constant between plasma and the extravascular extracellular space (EES) (K-trans) in areas of high blood volume. Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with high-grade gliomas underwent DCE-MRI. Three kinetic models were applied to estimate K-trans and fractional blood plasma volume (v(p)). We applied the Tofts and Kermode (TK) model without arterial input function (AIF) estimation, the TK model modified to include v(p) and AIF estimation (mTK), and a first pass variant of the TK model (FP). Results: K-TK values were considerably higher than K-mTK and K-FP values (P < 0.001). K-mTK and K-FP were more comparable and closely correlated (p = 0.744), with K-mTK generally higher than K-FP (P < 0.001). Estimates of v(p(mTK)) and v(p(FP)) also showed a significant difference (P < 0.001); however, these values were very closely correlated (p = 0.901). K-TK parameter maps showed pseudopermeability effects displaying numerous vessels. These were not visualized on K-mTK and K-FP maps but appeared on the corresponding vp maps, indicating a failure of the TK model in commonly occurring vascular regions. Conclusion: Both of the methods that incorporate a measured AIF and an estimate of v(p) provide similar pathophysiological information and avoid erroneous overestimation of K-trans in areas of significant vessel density, and thus allow a more accurate estimation of endothelial permeability. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据