4.7 Article

Increased plasma S100A12 (EN-RAGE) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 89, 期 11, 页码 5423-5428

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2003-032223

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S100A12, also called EN-RAGE (extracellular newly identified receptor for advanced glycation end products binding protein) or calcium-binding protein in amniotic fluid-1, is a ligand for RAGE. It has been shown that S100A12 induces adhesion molecules such as vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in the vascular endothelial cell and mediates migration and activation of monocytes/macrophages through RAGE binding and that infusion of lipopolysaccharide into mice causes time-dependent increase of S100A12 in the plasma. Therefore, circulating S100A12 protein may be involved in chronic inflammation in the atherosclerotic lesion. In this study, we developed an ELISA system that uses specific monoclonal antibodies against recombinant human S100A12 to measure plasma S100A12 levels in patients with diabetes. On using our S100A12 ELISA system, the coefficients of variation of intra- and interassay were less than 4 and 9%, respectively. The analytical lower detection limit was 0.2 ng/ml. When plasma S100A12 levels were measured by this system, the concentrations were more than twice as high in the patients with diabetes, compared with those without. Using univariate analysis in all subjects, plasma S100A12 concentrations correlated with hemoglobin A1c, fasting glucose, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and white blood cell count. Stepwise multiple regression analyses, however, revealed that only white blood cell count and hemoglobin A1c remained significant independent determinants of plasma S100A12 concentration. These results suggest that plasma S100A12 protein levels are regulated by factors related to subclinical inflammation and glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据