4.2 Article

The characteristics of human NKT cells in lung cancer - CD1d independent cytotoxicity against lung cancer cells by NKT cells and decreased human NKT cell response in lung cancer patients

期刊

HUMAN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 65, 期 11, 页码 1377-1388

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2004.09.003

关键词

human; V alpha 24NKT cells; lung cancer; CD1d; cytotoxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activation of human Valpha24(+)-Vbeta11(+) natural killer T cells (NKT) cells (Valpha24 NKT cells) induces effective antitumor responses with secondary immune effects through activation of conventional T cells and natural killer cells. In this study, we attempted to analyze the characteristics of human NKT cells in lung cancer patients. Valpha24 NKT cells stimulated with alpha-GalCer from healthy volunteers exhibited direct cytotoxic activity against two (RERF-LC-OK and PC-3) of seven human lung cancer cell lines studied. Cytotoxicity by Valpha24 NKT cells against human lung cancer cells was dependent on the perforin pathway and independent of Fas/FasL pathway. Intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 expression on tumor cells was clearly associated with the cytotoxicity of Va24 NKT cells. On the other hand, the proportion of Va24 NKT cells in the patients with lung cancer was lower than that in the healthy volunteers. Furthermore, the proliferative response of Valpha24 NKT cells to alpha-GalCer was significantly lower in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the patients with lung cancer. Addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor moderately restored the low proliferative response of Valpha24 NKT cells in the patients with lung cancer, however the percentage by which the response was restored in these patients was still lower than the natural response in healthy volunteers. These results suggest that Valpha24 NKT cells may play a pivotal role or the antitumor response in lung cancer. (C) American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics, 2004. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据