4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Nitric oxide-sensitive guanylyl cyclase: structure and regulation

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 45, 期 6, 页码 813-819

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2004.03.011

关键词

nitric oxide; NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase; cGMP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By the formation of the second messenger cGMP, NO-sensitive guanylyl cyclase (GC) plays a key role within the NO/cGMP signaling cascade which participates in vascular regulation and neurotransmission. The enzyme contains a prosthetic heme group that acts as the acceptor site for NO. High affinity binding of NO to the heme moiety leads to an up to 200-fold activation of the enzyme. Unexpectedly, NO dissociates with a half-life of a few seconds which appears fast enough to account for the deactivation of the enzyme in biological systems. YC-1 and its analogs act as NO sensitizers and led to the discovery of a novel pharmacologically and conceivably physiologically relevant regulatory principle of the enzyme. The two isoforms of the heterodimeric enzyme (alpha(1)beta(1), alpha(2)beta(1)) are known that are functionally indistinguishable. The alpha(2)beta(1)-isoform mainly occurs in brain whereas the alpha(1)beta(1)-enzyme shows a broader distribution and represents the predominantly expressed form of NO-sensitive GC. Until recently, the enzyme has been thought to occur in the cytosol. However, latest evidence suggests that the alpha(2)-subunit mediates the membrane association of the alpha(2)beta(1)-isoform via interaction with a PDZ domain of the post-synaptic scaffold protein PSD-95. Binding to PSD-95 locates this isoform in close proximity to the NO-generating synthases thereby enabling the NO sensor to respond to locally elevated NO concentrations. In sum, the two known isoforms may stand for the neuronal and vascular form of NO-sensitive GC reflecting a possible association to the neuronal and endothelial NO-synthase, respectively. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据