4.7 Article

Theoretical study of the external heavy atom effect on phosphorescence of free-base porphin molecule

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2004.03.005

关键词

phosphorescence; free-base porphin; time-dependent density function theory; quadratic response function; external heavy atom effect

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The radiative lifetime of phosphorescence of free-base porphin (H2P) molecule and its complexes with noble-gas atoms are calculated by time-dependent density functions theory (TD DFT) with quadratic response functions for account of spin-orbit coupling and electric dipole activity. The complexes with Ne, Ar, Kr, and Xe are used to simulate the external heavy atom (EHA) effect on phosphorescence of the H2P molecule in the corresponding noble gas matrices. The 133LYP functional and small basis set (3-21G) are used throughout the study and comparison of all complexes but other basis sets are also utilized to support the chosen approach. A slow radiative rate constant of free-base porphin phosphorescence (about 10(-3) S-1) is obtained with all basis sets being in the order of magnitude agreement with experimental estimations. A strong enhancement of the H2P phosphorescence rate (by 360 times) is calculated for Xe complex; while for Ne, Ar, and Kr complexes, the enhancement is equal to 1.1, 1.3, and 10.3 times, respectively. In these complexes, the noble gas atom is disposed at 3.6 Angstrom above the center of the porphin ring. In spite of shortcomings of the chosen simple model, the TD DFT calculations explain the most important features of the EHA effect on phosphorescence of free-base porphin. Calculations of the hypertine coupling tensors for all magnetic nuclei in the lowest triplet state of H2P molecule and its complexes with noble-gas atoms indicate an appreciable penetration of the spin density to the EHA region. This can be connected with the enhancement of spin-orbit coupling in the H2P molecule. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据