4.5 Article

Evidence that exogenous and endogenous fractalkine can induce spinal nociceptive facilitation in rats

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 20, 期 9, 页码 2294-2302

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03709.x

关键词

CX3CR1; CX3CL1; microglia; mechanical allodynia; thermal hyperalgesia

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI48555] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [DA015642] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [NS38020, NS40696] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent evidence suggests that spinal cord glia can contribute to enhanced nociceptive responses. However, the signals that cause glial activation are unknown. Fractalkine (CX3C ligand-1; CX3CL1) is a unique chemokine expressed on the extracellular surface of spinal neurons and spinal sensory afferents. In the dorsal spinal cord, fractalkine receptors are primarily expressed by microglia. As fractalkine can be released from neurons upon strong activation, it has previously been suggested to be a neuron-to-glial signal that induces glial activation. The present series of experiments provide an initial investigation of the spinal pain modulatory effects of fractalkine. Intrathecal fractalkine produced dose-dependent mechanical allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia. In addition, a single injection of fractalkine receptor antagonist (neutralizing antibody against rat CX3C receptor-1; CX3CR1) delayed the development of mechanical allodynia and/or thermal hyperalgesia in two neuropathic pain models: chronic constriction injury (CCI) and sciatic inflammatory neuropathy. Intriguingly, anti-CX3CR1 reduced nociceptive responses when administered 5-7 days after CCI, suggesting that prolonged release of fractalkine may contribute to the maintenance of neuropathic pain. Taken together, these initial investigations of spinal fractalkine effects suggest that exogenous and endogenous fractalkine are involved in spinal sensitization, including that induced by peripheral neuropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据