4.2 Review

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) in the treatment of diabetes

期刊

HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH
卷 36, 期 11-12, 页码 852-858

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826175

关键词

glucagon-like peptide-1; incretin; incretin mimetic; type 2 diabetes; insulin; glucagon; beta-cell; obesity; gastric emptying

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) was discovered as an incretin (insulinotropic gut) hormone. Biological actions of GLP-1 in healthy and type 2 diabetic subjects include (a) stimulation of insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner; (b) suppression of glucagon, (c) reduction in appetite and food intake, (d) deceleration of gastric emptying. In animal experiments, in addition, (e) stimulation of beta-cell neogenesis, growth and differentiation in animal and tissue culture experiments, and (f) in vitro inhibition of beta-cell apoptosis induced by different agents have been observed. Since the incretin effect - the higher insulin secretory response to oral as compared to intravenous glucose loads - is reduced in patients with Type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 has been used to pharmacologically replace incretin. Intravenous GLP-1 can normalise, and subcutaneous GLP-1 can significantly lower plasma glucose in the majority of patients with Type 2 diabetes. The magnitude of this effect does not greatly depend on patient characteristics such as age, sex, obesity, or baseline insulin and glucagon, with minor influences of previous antidiabetic therapy and actual metabolic control. GLP-1 itself, however, is inactivated rapidly in vivo by the protease DPP IV and can only be used for short-term metabolic control, such as in intensive care units (potentially useful in patients with acute myocardial infarction, coronary surgery, cerebrovascular events, septicaemia, during the perioperative period and while on parenteral nutrition): For more long-term metabolic control, incretin mimetics (agonists at the GLP-1 receptor) with more favourable pharmacokinetic profiles should be used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据