4.8 Article

Soil acidification induced by elevated atmospheric CO2

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 1936-1946

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00864.x

关键词

acidification; alkalinity; carbonic acid; cation exchange; CO2; column; ecosystem; mineral dissolution; saprolite; soil; weathering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil acidification is a very important process in the functioning of earth's ecosystems. A major source of soil acidity is CO2, derived from the respiration of plant roots and microbes, which forms carbonic acid in soil waters. Because elevated atmospheric CO2 often stimulates respiration of soil biota in experiments that test ecosystem effects of elevated atmospheric CO2, we hypothesize that rising atmospheric CO2 (which has increased from similar to200 ppm since the interglacial and may exceed 550 ppm by the end of the 21st century) is significantly increasing acid inputs to soils. Here, using column-leaching experiments with contrasting soils, we demonstrate that soil CO2 is a much more potent agent of soil acidification than is generally appreciated, capable of displacing almost all exchangeable base cations in soils, and even elevating Al(III) concentrations in H2CO3-acidified soil waters. The potent soil acidifying potential of soil H2CO3 is attributed to the low pK(a,1) of molecular H2CO3 (3.76 at 25degreesC), which contrasts greatly with that of H2CO3* (a convention that combines CO2 (aq) and molecular H2CO3, the pK(a,1) of which is 6.36 at 25degreesC). This distinction is significant for soil systems because of soil's greatly elevated CO2, their variety of sinks for H+, and the wide range of contact times between soil solids, water, and gas. Modelling suggests that a doubling of atmospheric CO2 may increase acid inputs from carbonic acid leaching by up to 50%. Combined with the results of CO2 studies in whole ecosystems, this implies that increases in atmospheric CO2 since the interglacial have gradually acidified soils, especially poorly buffered soils, throughout the world.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据