4.2 Review

Molecular changes in gliomas

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
卷 16, 期 6, 页码 607-613

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.cco.0000142485.81849.cc

关键词

glioma; oligodendroglioma; glioblastoma; gene; angiogenesis; invasion; microarray

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Despite optimal clinical treatment, the prognosis for gliomas remains poor, and little progress has been observed during the last few years. Meanwhile, understanding of glioma oncogenesis has improved greatly. This review focuses on recent advances in molecular biology of glial tumors, with particular emphasis on lineage markers, genetic mechanisms underlying tumor progression, new diagnostic and prognostic markers, and potential therapeutic targets. Recent findings The question of the cell of origin, illustrated by the evidence of tumor-derived multipotent progenitors, by the animal models of gliomas, and by lineage markers such as Olig1/2 markers, remains unsolved. Genotype/phenotype correlation studies have identified early and late genetic alterations related either to astrocytic or oligodendroglial phenotype. They complement the existing World Health Organization morphologic classification and provide additional prognostic markers such as 1p/19q deletion in oligodendrogliomas. Most of these genetic alterations result in the disruption of three main cellular systems: RB1, P53, and tyrosine kinase receptor pathways. New gene alterations have also been identified in glioma, promoting mitotic signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, or invasion. Gene and protein profiling has been correlated with outcome. Summary Management of gliomas, especially oligodendrogliomas with 1p19q deletion, benefits from advances in molecular genetics. A better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and cellular lineage of gliomas will improve tumor classification and define more reliable prognostic markers. There is a hope that it will also lead to novel targets for therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据