4.2 Article

First flush concepts for suspended and dissolved solids in small impervious watersheds

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
卷 130, 期 11, 页码 1301-1314

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2004)130:11(1301)

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eight rainfall-runoff events were examined from each of two small paved urban transportation land use watersheds (A = 544 m(2) and 300 m(2)) in an attempt to distill Multiple definitions of the first flush phenomenon into a consistent framework and examine common volumetric capture requirements. Results indicated that two separate criteria must be employed to describe the delivery of suspended sediment concentration (SSC) and total dissolved solids (TDS) as aggregate indices of entrained particulate and dissolved matter. The concentration-based first flush criterion is defined by high initial SSC or TDS concentration in the early portion of a rainfall-runoff event with a subsequent rapid concentration decline. In contrast, the mass-based first flush (MBFF) has several published forms, shown to be equivalent herein. The MBFF is defined generally as a disproportionately high mass delivery in relation to corresponding flow volume. For mass-limited events, mass delivery was skewed towards the initial portion of the event while the mass delivery in flow limited events tended to follow the hydrograph. This study also investigated published estimates of the water quality volume (WQV); assuming that an in-situ Control Strategy or Best Management Practice (BMP) captures and treats only this WQV, while flows in excess of this volume bypass the BMP. For the two watersheds, results indicate that a relatively large runoff volume must be captured to effect meaningful reductions in mass and concentrations (as event mean concentrations) despite a disproportionately high mass delivery early in the event. Results suggest the potential for misinterpretation of overall BMP effectiveness may be significant based on use of a number of these common published estimates based on a WQV.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据