4.3 Article

Aphid suppression by natural enemies in mulched cereals

期刊

ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 87-93

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00205.x

关键词

Araneida; Cecidomyiidae; conservation biological control; predation; Diptera; Syrphidae; trophic interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large populations of natural enemies are the basis for natural pest control. Effects of mulch on predator-prey interactions in arable fields are poorly known, despite its potential to enhance ground-dwelling predators and thereby reduce pest infestations. We studied the densities of predators and parasitoids, and their impact on cereal aphids in the presence and absence of mulch. Released populations of the bird cherry aphid, Rhopalosiphum padi (L.) (Homoptera: Aphididae), and two naturally occurring aphid species, were monitored under experimentally reduced densities of: (i) ground-dwelling predators, (ii) flying predators and parasitoids, and (iii) with straw mulch. The three treatments were applied in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial design in a field of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The exclusion of ground-dwelling predators increased aphid populations by 55% in June and 40% in July, respectively. Mulched plots had 25% lower aphid densities in June. This was presumably due to enhanced densities of spiders (Araneida) in mulched plots. The exclusion of flying predators and parasitoids led to 94% higher aphid populations in late July (109 vs. 56 individuals per 100 shoots), irrespective of mulch or ground predator manipulation. This was attributed to the larvae of gall midges Aphidoletes cf. aphidimyza (Rondani) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae). The results indicate that a scarcity of predators and a bare soil surface renders crops more susceptible to arthropod pests. Farming schemes should aim at enhancing both ground-dwelling and flying predators for elevated levels of natural pest control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据