4.3 Article

In vivo evaluation of copper-64-labeled monooxo-tetraazarnacrocyclic ligands

期刊

NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 31, 期 8, 页码 1051-1059

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2004.08.011

关键词

copper-64; biodistribution; macrocycle; MicroPET

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1 P30 CA91842, R24 CA86307, CA42925] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Copper-64 (T-1/2 = 12.7 h; beta(+) : 0.653 MeV, 17.4%; beta(-) : 0.578 MeV, 39%) has applications in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and radiotherapy, and is conveniently produced on a biomedical cyclotron. Tetraazamacrocyclic ligands are the most widely used bifunctional chelators (BFCs) for attaching copper radionuclides to antibodies and peptides due to their relatively high kinetic stability. In this paper, we evaluated three monooxo-tetraazamacrocyclic ligands with different ring sizes and oxo group positions. H1 [ 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclotridecan-11-one], H2 [1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecan-5-one] and H3 [1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclotridecan-2-one] were radiolabeled with (CU)-C-64 in high radiochemical yields under mild conditions. The three Cu-64-labeled complexes are all +1 charged, as determined by their electrophoretic mobility. While they demonstrated > 95% stability in rat serum out to 24h, both biodistribution and microPET imaging studies revealed high uptake and long retention of the compounds in major clearance organs (e.g., blood, liver and kidney), which suggests that Cu-64 dissociated from the complexes in vivo. Of the three complexes, Cu-64-2(+), which has a cyclam backbone (1,4,8,11-tetraazacyclotetradecane), exhibited the lowest nontarget organ accumulation. The data from these studies may invalidate the candidacy of the monooxo-tetraazamacrocyclics as BFCs for copper radiopharmaceuticals. However, the data presented here suggest that neutral or negatively charged Cu(II) complexes of tetraazamacrocyclic ligands with a cyclam backbone (tetradecane) are optimal for copper radiopharmaceutical applications. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据