4.6 Article

Methane steam reforming by microporous catalytic membrane reactors

期刊

AICHE JOURNAL
卷 50, 期 11, 页码 2794-2805

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10215

关键词

catalytic membrane reactor; methane steam reforming; autothermal; porous silica membranes; hydrogen; simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methane steam reforming, with and without added oxygen, was theoretically and experimentally investigated using microporous silica membranes, thus allowing the permeation of hydrogen as well as other gases in reactants and products. A simulation of catalytic membrane reactors was carried out for a cocurrent, isothermal, and plug-flow-type membrane reactor with the selective permeation of hydrogen through microporous membranes. The effect of operating conditions on the conversion of methane and hydrogen production is discussed with the aid of two dimensionless numbers, the Damkohler number (Da) and the permeation number (theta). Methane conversion, X-CH4, has approximately the same dependency on permeation number in terms of the permeability ratios of hydrogen over nitrogen, whereas the purity of hydrogen in the permeate increased with increasing hydrogen selectivity. Catalytic membrane reactors, consisting of a silica microporous layer and a Ni-catalyst layer, were prepared. The permeability ratio of hydrogen over steam, alpha(H-2/H2O), which ranged from 1 to 20, showed a relatively good correlation with that for helium over hydrogen, alpha(He/H-2). Catalytic membrane reactors showing a hydrogen selectivity over nitrogen of 30-100, with hydrogen permeances of 0.5(-3) X 10(-7) mol m(-2) s(-1) Pa-1 were applied to the steam reforming of methane with and without the addition of oxygen. The reaction was carried out at 500degreesC, and the feed and permeate pressure were maintained at 100 and 20 kPa, respectively. Methane conversion, X-CH4, increased up to approximately 0.8 beyond the equilibrium conversion of 0.44 by extracting hydrogen in permeate stream. (C) 2004 American Institute of Chemical Engineers

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据