4.4 Article

The old open clusters M67 and NGC 188: Convective core overshooting, color-temperature relations, distances, and ages

期刊

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/426340

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The color-magnitude diagram of M67 is used to constrain the value of the parameter F-over in its approximate to1.3 M-. turnoff stars: F-over is effectively the fraction of the maximum possible extent of convective core F over overshooting predicted by the Roxburgh ( 1989, A& A, 211, 361) criterion. Isochrones that treat overshooting using the parameterized Roxburgh criterion are able to reproduce the morphology of the cluster turnoff, including the luminosity of the gap, if F-over approximate to 0.07 (assuming current best estimates for the reddening and metallicity). Previous studies have derived values of F-over near 0.5 in open clusters of similar metallicity but having turnoff F over masses greater than or equal to 1.55 M-., indicating that the overshooting parameter is a strong function of mass in the lowest mass stars that retain convective cores throughout the main-sequence phase. NGC 188 appears to be too old for core overshooting to play any role in the evolution of stars that are currently in the core H-burning phase, but the availability of well-calibrated BVRI photometry for this system, together with Landolt photometric standards, provides valuable tests of the color-T-eff relations that apply to [Fe/H] approximate to 0.0 stars. Our analysis of color-color diagrams, in particular, suggests that the Castelli (1999, A& A, 346, 564) V-R and V-I transformations for lower gravity stars are more realistic than those published recently by VandenBerg & Clem ( 2003, AJ, 126, 778). The same color-color diagrams also indicate that the differences in recent (V-I, V) diagrams for M67 appear to be due, at least in part, to the difficulty of defining the standard VRI photometric system. The ages of M67 and NGC 188 that have been derived in this study are 4.0 and 6.8 Gyr, respectively, which is consistent with other modern determinations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据