4.7 Article

Titania and alumina sol-gel-derived microfluidics enzymatic-reactors for peptide mapping: Design, characterization, and performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROTEOME RESEARCH
卷 3, 期 6, 页码 1201-1209

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/pr049889z

关键词

microfluidic enzymatic-reactor; titania; alumina; MALDI-TOF-MS; ESI-MS high-throughput protein identification; proteomics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The design and characterization of titania-based and alumina-based Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) microfluidics enzymatic-reactors along with their analytical features in coupling with MALDI-TOF and ESI-MS were reported. Microfluidics with microchannel and stainless steel tubing (SST) were fabricated using PDMS casting and O-2-Plasma techniques, and were used for the preparation of an enzymatic-reactor. Plasma oxidation for the PDMS microfluidic system enabled the channel wall of the microfluidics to present a layer of silanol (SiOH) groups. These SiOH groups act as anchors onto the microchannel wall linked covalently with the hydroxyl groups of trypsin-encapsulated Sol matrix. As a result, the trypsin-encapsulated gel matrix was anchored onto the wall of the microchannel, and the leakage of gel matrix from the microchannel was effectively prevented. A feature of the microfluidic enzymatic-reactors is the feasibility of performing on-line protein analysis by attached SST electrode and replaceable tip. The success of trypsin encapsulation was investigated by AFM imaging, assay of enzymatic activity, CE detection, and MALDI-TOF and ESI-MS analysis. The lab-made devices provide an excellent extent of digestion even at a fast flow rate of 7.0 muL/min, which affords the very short residence time of ca. 2 s. With the present device, the digestion time was significantly shortened compared to conventional tryptic reaction schemes. In addition, the encapsulated trypsin exhibits increased stability even after continuous use. These features are required for high-throughput protein identification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据