4.7 Article

Metabolic syndrome as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in type 3 diabetes

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 2689-2694

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.11.2689

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE- The aim of this study was to assess in an 11-year survival follow-up of a population-based cohort of type 2 diabetes the predictive role of World Health Organization-defined metabolic syndrome, independent of conventional cardiovascular risk factors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS- During the follow-up (1991-2001), 1565 patients were regularly examined with centralized measurements of HbA(1c). The independent role of the metabolic syndrome as a predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was assessed with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS- At baseline, the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome was 75.6% (95% CI 73.6-77.9). Results are based on 685 deaths (520 with the metabolic syndrome and 165 without it) in 10,890.2 person-years of observations. With respect to subjects without the metabolic syndrome, those with the metabolic syndrome had a similar hazard ratio (HR) of cardiovascular mortality after adjustment for age, sex, smoking, total cholesterol level, and coronary heart disease. In contrast, relative to subjects with diabetes only, the HR of subjects with only one component of the syndrome was 2.92 (1.16-7.33), independent of other risk factors. CONCLUSIONS- we found that 1) the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in a population-based cohort of type 2 diabetes is high (75.6%); 2) the metabolic syndrome is not a predictor of 11-year all-cause and cardiovascular mortality; and 3) more than twofold higher cardiovascular risk, independent of conventional risk factors, is evident in diabetic subjects with only one component of the syndrome compared with those with diabetes only. Categorizing type 2 diabetic subjects as having or not having the metabolic syndrome does not provide further prediction compared with the knowledge of its single components.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据