4.7 Article

Left ventricular function during and after right ventricular pacing

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 9, 页码 1883-1888

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.074

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR-00048] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The aim of this research was to evaluate right ventricular pacing effects on left ventricular function. BACKGROUND Right ventricular pacing alters the ventricular activation sequence and reduces left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). It is unclear whether the observed reduction in EF can be completely attributed to the alteration in activation sequence. METHODS Twelve subjects (eight women), mean age 68 +/- 12 years, with transvenous dual-chamber pacemakers, normal left ventricular function, and intact atrioventricular (AV) conduction were studied with serial-gated blood pool studies. Left ventricular EF was measured at a fixed rate after at least 1 week of atrial pacing only (baseline), during short-term (2 h) and mid-term (1 week) AV sequential pacing with a short AV delay, and after short- and mid-term AV pacing. RESULTS Baseline EF was 66.5 +/- 4.5%. Short-term AV pacing resulted in a decrease in EF to 60.3 +/- 5.2% (p < 0.0002). After one week of AV pacing, there was a further decline in EF to 52.9 +/- 8.3% (p < 0.0001). After cessation of mid-term pacing, EF was 57.3 +/- 5.9% (p < 0.0001 vs. baseline). A total of 2, 5, 8, and 24 h later, EF remained depressed (59% to 60%, p < 0.007). At 32 h, EF was 62.9 +/- 7.6% (p < 0.11 compared with baseline). CONCLUSIONS The abnormal activation sequence resulting from right ventricular pacing accounts for only part of the reduction in EF as mid-term pacing is associated with a lower EF than short-term pacing, and EF remains depressed after cessation of AV pacing. Changes in ventricular function induced by right ventricular pacing may account for some of its associated adverse effects. (C) 2004 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据