4.4 Article

Flame retardant mechanisms of red phosphorus and magnesium hydroxide in high impact polystyrene

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 205, 期 16, 页码 2185-2196

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/macp.200400255

关键词

additives; flame retardance; polystyrene; pyrolysis; thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flame retardant mechanisms of red phosphorus, magnesium hydroxide and red phosphorus combined with magnesium hydroxide were studied in high impact polystyrene by means of comprehensive decomposition studies and combustion tests. The study is intended to illuminate prerequisites and the potential of red phosphorus as a fire retardant for hydrocarbon polymers in the condensed phase and in the gas phase. Thermal and thermo-oxidative decomposition, decomposition kinetics and the product gases evolved were characterized using thermogravimetry coupled with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and mass spectroscopy, respectively. Fire behaviour was investigated with a cone calorimeter using different external heat fluxes, whereas the flammability was determined by limited oxygen indices. The combustion residues were analysed using XPS. Red phosphorus reduced the heat release in HIPS due to radical trapping in the gas phase. Magnesium hydroxide influenced fire behaviour by heat sink mechanisms, release of water and the formation of a magnesia layer acting as a barrier. The combination of both flame retardants in HIPS nearly resulted in a superposition. A slight synergy in barrier characteristics was due to the formation of magnesium phosphate, whereas a slight anti-synergism occurred in flammability and in the gas phase action. The latter effect is controlled by a decreased fuel rate due to the barrier layer rather than by an initiation of red phosphorus oxidation in the condensed phase. [GRAPHICS] Heat release rate and total heat release at various external heat fluxes for HIPS (dotted = 70 kW (.) m(-2), dashed = 50 kW (.) m(-2), solid = 30 kW (.) m(-2)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据