4.4 Article

Late presenters in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy: uptake of and responses to antiretroviral therapy

期刊

AIDS
卷 18, 期 16, 页码 2145-2151

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002030-200411050-00006

关键词

late presenters; CD4 cell count; treatment response; virological response; resource use

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To investigate the characteristics and clinical, immunological and virological outcomes for individuals presenting for care with low CD4 cell counts. Methods: Individuals aged > 16 years presenting for care for the first time were identified between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2002. Late presenters were those with CD4 cell count < 50 x 10(6) cells/l. Follow-up was until last contact, death or 31 December 2002. Results: Late presenters formed 15.3% (110) of the group; they were more likely to be female (35% versus 24%), heterosexual (53% versus 38%), and of Black-African ethnicity (39% versus 27%) than other individuals. Over a median follow-up of 2.5 years, 13% of late presenters died. Ninety-nine patients started antiretroviral treatment; Of the 11 patients who did not start antiretroviral treatment, eight died within 3 months of presentation. Among those starting treatment, 87 (87.9%) achieved a viral load < 400 copies/ml and median CD4 cell counts increased from 43 x 10(6) cells/l at 0-2 months after presentation to 204 x 10(6) cells/l at 1 year. Over the first year, 71 patients attended at least one outpatient visit (median, 4.5; range, 0-39), 21 attended at least one day case visit (median, 0; range, 0-15) and 49 were admitted as an inpatient (median, 0; range, 0-4). Conclusions: Those presenting for care with very low CD4 cell counts may make large demands on clinical resources, particularly over the first few months. While some patients do have a poor outcome on highly active antiretroviral therapy, many will benefit from this therapy and will experience good immunological and virological responses. (C) 2004 Lippincott Williams Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据