4.7 Article

Progesterone attenuates corticotropin-releasing factor-enhanced but not fear-potentiated startle via the activity of its neuroactive metabolite, allopregnanolone

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 24, 期 45, 页码 10280-10287

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1386-04.2004

关键词

startle; BNST; progesterone; CRH; anxiety; THP

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [P50 MH058922, MH 47840, MH 59906, P50 MH052384, R01 MH047840, MH 58922, R37 MH047840, MH 52384, R01 MH059906] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intact female rats and ovariectomized ( OVX) rats with different ovarian steroid replacement regimens were tested for changes in corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-enhanced startle (increased acoustic startle amplitude after intracerebroventricular infusion of 1 mug of CRF). OVX rats injected with estradiol (E) followed by progesterone ( P) showed a blunted CRF-enhanced startle effect compared with OVX and E-injected rats. CRF-enhanced startle also was reduced significantly in lactating females ( high endogenous P levels) compared with cycling rats ( low to moderate P levels), as well as in non-E-primed rats when P was administered acutely ( 4 hr before testing) or chronically ( 7 d P replacement). The ability of P to attenuate CRF-enhanced startle was probably mediated by its metabolite allopregnanolone [ tetrahydroprogesterone ( THP)], because THP itself had a similar effect, and chronic administration of medroxyprogesterone, which is not metabolized to THP, did not blunt CRF-enhanced startle but instead slightly increased it. These data suggest that P blunts CRF-enhanced startle through a mechanism involving its neuroactive metabolite THP, although a role for the P receptor cannot be completely ruled out. Finally, neither chronic P replacement nor acute THP affected fear-potentiated startle, suggesting that P metabolites have an effect on the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and anxiety rather than on the amygdala and stimulus-specific fear.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据