4.7 Article

Metabolic effects of carvedilol vs metoprolol in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension - A randomized controlled trial

期刊

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 292, 期 18, 页码 2227-2236

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.18.2227

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context beta-Blockers have been shown to decrease cardiovascular risk in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM); however, some components of the metabolic syndrome are worsened by some beta-blockers. Objective To compare the effects of beta-blockers with different pharmacological profiles on glycemic and metabolic control in participants with DM and hypertension receiving renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade, in the context of cardiovascular risk factors. Design, Setting, and Participants A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial (The Glycemic Effects in Diabetes Mellitus: Carvedilol-Metoprolol Comparison in Hypertensives [GEMINI]) conducted between June 1, 2001, and April 6, 2004, at 205 US sites that compared the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate on glycemic control. The 1235 participants were aged 36 to 85 years with hypertension (>130/80 mm Hg) and type 2 DM (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], 6.5%-8.5%) and were receiving RAS blockers. Participants were followed up for 35 weeks. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive a 6.25- to 25-mg dose of carvedilol (n=498)or 50- to 200-mg dose of metoprolol tartrate (n=737),each twice daily. open-label hydrochlorothiazide and a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist were added, if needed, to achieve blood pressure target. Main Outcome Measures Difference between groups in mean change from baseline HbA(1c) following 5 months of maintenance therapy. Additional prespecified comparisons included change from baseline HbA(1c) in individual treatment groups, treatment effect on insulin sensitivity, and microalbuminuria. Results The 2 groups differed in mean change in HbA(1c) from baseline (0.13%; 95% confidence interval [CI],-0.22% to-0.04%; P=.004; modified intention-to-treat analysis). The mean (SD) HbA(1c) increased with metoprolol (0.15% [0.04%]; P<.001) but not carvedilol (0.02% [0.04%]; P=.65). Insulin sensitivity improved with carvedilol (-9.1%; P=.004) but not metoprolol (-2.0%; P=.48); the between-group difference was -7.2% (95% CI, -13.8% to -0.2%; P=.004). Blood pressure was similar between groups. Progression to microalbuminuria was less frequent with carvedilol than with metoprolol (6.4% vs 10.3%; odds ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36-0.97; P=.04). Conclusions Both beta-blockers were well tolerated; use of carvedilol in the presence of RAS blockade did not affect glycemic control and improved some components of the metabolic syndrome relative to metoprolol in participants with DM and hypertension. The effects of the 2 beta-blockers on clinical outcomes need to be compared in long-term clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据