3.9 Article

Late Eocene to early Miocene ice sheet dynamics and the global carbon cycle

期刊

PALEOCEANOGRAPHY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2004PA001039

关键词

Cenozoic paleoceanography; Antarctic ice sheet; silicate weathering Mg/Ca paleoceanography; sea level; Ocean Drilling Program; Site 1218

向作者/读者索取更多资源

[1] Paired benthic foraminiferal trace metal and stable isotope records have been constructed from equatorial Pacific Ocean Drilling Program Site 1218. The records include the two largest abrupt (< 1 Myr) increases in the Cenozoic benthic oxygen isotope record: Oi-1 in the earliest Oligocene ( similar to 34 Ma) and Mi-1 in the earliest Miocene ( similar to 23 Ma). The paired Mg/Ca and oxygen isotope records are used to calculate seawater delta O-18 (delta w). Calculated delta w suggests that a large Antarctic ice sheet formed during Oi-1 and subsequently fluctuated throughout the Oligocene on both short (< 0.5 Myr) and long ( 2 - 3 Myr) timescales, between about 50 and 100% of its maximum earliest Oligocene size. The magnitudes of these fluctuations are consistent with estimates of sea level derived from sequence stratigraphy. The transient expansion of the Antarctic ice sheet at Mi-1 is marked in the benthic delta(18)O record by two positive excursions between 23.7 and 22.9 Ma, each with a duration of 200-300 kyr. Bottom water temperatures decreased by similar to2degreesC over the 150 kyr immediately prior to both rapid delta(18)O excursions. However, the onset of each of these phases of ice growth is synchronous, within the resolution of the records, with the onset of a 2 degreesC warming over similar to 150 kyr. We suggest that the warming during these glacial expansions reflect increased greenhouse forcing prompted by a sudden decrease in global chemical weathering rates as Antarctic basement silicate rocks became blanketed by an ice sheet. This represents a negative feedback process that might have operated during major abrupt growth phases of the Antarctic ice sheet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据