4.2 Article

A mixed epigenetic/genetic model for oligogenic inheritance of autism with a limited role for UBE3A

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30297

关键词

Angelman syndrome; autism; complex disease traits; DNA methylation; epigenetics; ubiquitin ligase

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [HD24064, HD37283] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK07664] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genetic contribution to autism is often attributed to the combined effects of many loci (ten or more). This conclusion is based in part on the much lower concordance for dizygotic (DZ) than for monozygotic (MZ) twins, and is consistent with the failure to find strong evidence for linkage in genome-wide studies. We propose that the twin data are compatible with oligogenic inheritance combined with a major, genetic or epigenetic, de novo component to the etiology. Based on evidence that maternal but not paternal duplications of chromosome 15q cause autism, we attempted to test the hypothesis that autism involves oligogenic inheritance (two or more loci) and that the Angelman gene (UBE3A), which encodes the E6-AP ubiquitin ligase, is one of the contributing genes. A search for epigenetic abnormalities led to the discovery of a tissue-specific differentially methylated region (DMR) downstream of the UBE3A coding exons, but the region was not abnormal in autism lymphoblasts or brain samples. Based on evidence for allele sharing in 15q among sib-pairs, abnormal DNA methylation at the 5'-CpG island of UBE3A in one of 17 autism brains, and decreased E6-AP protein in some autism brains, we propose a mixed epigenetic and genetic model for autism with both de novo and inherited contributions. The role of UBE3A may be quantitatively modest, but interacting proteins such as those ubiquitinated by UBE3A may be candidates for a larger role in an oligogenic model. A mixed epigenetic and genetic and mixed de novo and inherited (MEGDI) model could be relevant to other 64 complex disease traits. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据