4.7 Article

A clinicobiological model predicting survival in medulloblastoma

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 22, 页码 7613-7620

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0499

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the relative contributions of biological and clinical predictors of survival in patients with medulloblastoma (MB). Experimental Design: Clinical presentation and survival information were obtained for 119 patients who had undergone surgery for MB at the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) between 1985 and 2001. A tissue mieroarray was constructed from the tumor samples. The arrays were assayed for inummohistochemical expression of MYC, p53, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-alpha, ErbB2, MIB-1, and TrkC and for apoptosis (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling). Both univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to characterize the association between survival and both clinical and biological markers. For the strongest predictors of survival, a weighted predictive score was calculated based on their hazard ratios (HRs). The sum of these scores was then used to give an overall prediction of survival using a nomogram. Results: The four strongest predictors of survival in the final multivariable model were the presence of metastatic disease at presentation (HR, 2.02; P = 0.01) and p53 (HR, 2.29; P = 0.02), TrkC (HR, 0.65; P = 0.14), and ErbB2 (HR, 1.51; P = 0.21) immunopositivity. A linear prognostic index was derived, with coefficients equal to the logarithm of these HRs. The 5-year survival rate for patients at the 10(th), 50(th), and 90(th) percentiles of the score distribution was 80.0%, 71.0%, and 35.7%, respectively, with radiation therapy and 70.5%, 58.5%, and 20.0%, respectively, without radiation therapy. Conclusions: In this study, we demonstrate an approach to combining both clinical and biological markers to quantify risk in MB patients. This provides further prognostic information than can be obtained when either clinical factors or biological markers are studied separately and establishes a framework for comparing prognostic markers in future clinical studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据