4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Cerebral ayloid angiopathy and gene polymorphisms

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 226, 期 1-2, 页码 41-44

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.09.009

关键词

cerebral amyloid angiopathy; gene polymorphism; amyloid beta protein; intracerebral hemorrhage; apolipoprotein E; neprilysin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is characterized by cerebrovascular amyloid deposition, associated with intracerebral hemorrhage and other cerebrovascular disorders and dementia. Several types of CAA have been identified in association with various amyloid proteins including amyloid beta protein (Abeta), cystatin C, prion protein, ABri/ADan, transthyretin, and gelsolin. Hereditary forms of CAA are associated with mutations in the genes coding these proteins or their precursors. Sporadic CAA of Abeta type is most common in elderly individuals as well as patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). Several gene polymorphisms have been reported to be associated with sporadic CAA or CAA-related hemorrhage, including apolipoprotein E (APOE), presenilin 1 (PS1), and alpha1-antichymotrypsin (ACT). As for the APOE, which has been well studied for CAA as well as AD and Abeta deposition, the epsilon4 allele is found to be associated with CAA, and the epsilon2 with CAA-related hemorrhage. Recently, we investigated whether gene polymorphisms of neprilysin (NEP), an Abeta-degrading enzyme, and the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 (TGF-beta1), a multifunctional cytokine implicated in Abeta deposition, are associated with sporadic CAA. Concerning a GT repeat polymorphism in the enhancer/promoter region of the NEP, the shorter repeat alleles were associated with the CAA severity. The T/C polymorphism at codon 10 in exon 1 of the TGF-beta1 was also associated with the severity of CAA. These data suggest that multiple gene polymorphisms, including molecules related to the A cascade, could be associated with the risk of sporadic CAA. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据