4.6 Article

Interactions between extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1, 14-3-3ε, and heat shock factor 1 during stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 279, 期 47, 页码 49460-49469

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M406059200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA50642, CA47407, CA31303] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cytoprotection during the heat shock response is a complex phenomenon involving multiple inducible mechanisms. We have examined the interaction of two key molecular components in the response, heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) and extracellular signal regulated protein kinase (ERK). Whereas both HSF1 and ERK are required to protect cells against apoptosis, ERK activation is paradoxically antagonistic to transactivation of hsp promoters by HSF1 and HSP accumulation during heat shock. We have found that the two pathways interact directly and that heat shock causes the physical association of ERK1 with HSF1, an interaction that promotes the kinase activity of ERK in heat-shocked cells. ERK activation results in the recruitment of the phosphoserine binding protein 14-3-3epsilon in a manner dependent on previous HSF1 phosphorylation by ERK. The effects of 14-3-3epsilon binding on HSF1 were complex, however, depending on extracellular conditions, in that HSF1-14-3-3 binding at 37degreesC led to the cytoplasmic sequestration and repression of HSF1, whereas heat shock overrode these effects and caused quantitative nuclear localization of HSF1. Although the effects of 14-3-3epsilon binding to HSF1 were overridden acutely by stress, during recovery from heat shock, 14-3-3epsilon association again led to enhanced cytoplasmic localization of HSF1, implicating a role for ERK/14-3-3epsilon in HSF1 deactivation in recovering cells. Association of HSF1 with ERK and 14-3-3epsilon during heat shock may thus modulate the amplitude of the response and lead to efficient termination of HSP expression on resumption of growth conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据