4.4 Article

Markedly reduced severity of Dengue virus infection in mosquito cell cultures persistently infected with Aedes albopictus densovirus (AalDNV)

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 329, 期 2, 页码 261-269

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.08.032

关键词

densovirus; Dengue virus; C6/36 cells; persistent infection; tolerance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AalDNV-infected C6/36 cells serially passaged for over 10 weeks showed a decline in percentage of anti-AalDNV-positive cells (APC) from an initial 92% to approximately 20%. Cultures of persistent APC were indistinguishable from uninfected cultures by direct microscopy but most stained cells from early APC passages had enlarged nuclei with eosinophilic inclusions, while late APC passages had few and naive cells none. Super challenge of persistent APC cultures did not increase percentage APC and supernatants from persistent APC cultures gave low APC (40%) in naive C6/36 cell cultures. When challenged with dengue virus serotype 2 (DEN-2), naive C6/36 cells showed severe cytopathic effects (CPE) and high mortality within 4 days, as did early passage APC cultures. Remarkably, DEN-2 infections in persistent APC cultures were much less severe, being characterized by reduced DEN-2 infection percentage, retarded DEN-2 virion production, no CPE and no significant mortality. Reasons for rapid reduction in APC and resistance to superinfection upon serial passage remain unproven but may relate to production of AalDNV-defective interfering particles (DIP) by molecular mechanisms still open to speculation. More difficult to explain is cross-protection against DEN-2-induced mortality seen in persistent APC cultures. However, by comparison to work on shrimp viruses, we speculate that this may involve blockage of viral-triggered apoptosis. The phenomena described raise questions regarding the potential for persistent infections by unknown viruses to confound experimental results with insect cell lines. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据