4.7 Article

Passage of erythropoietic agents across the blood-brain barrier: a comparison of human and murine erythropoietin and the analog darbepoetin alfa

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 505, 期 1-3, 页码 93-101

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.10.035

关键词

brain; pharmacokinetics; drug delivery; blood-brain barrier; erythropoietin; stroke; neuroprotection

资金

  1. NIAAA NIH HHS [R01 AA12743] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS41863] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies have suggested that erythropoietin (EPO) may be used to treat stroke in both animals and humans. It is thought to exert its effects directly on the brain and studies with therapeutic doses have shown that it can cross the blood-brain barrier. Here, we compared in a blinded fashion the ability of three erythropoietic agents (marine erythropoietin, human erythropoietin, and darbepoetin alfa, an analog of human erythropoietin in clinical use) to cross the blood-brain barrier of the mouse. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) results showed that all three erythropoietic agents were enzymatically resistant in brain and blood. The unidirectional blood-to-brain influx rates (K-i) as measured by multiple-time regression analysis showed that all the erythropoietic agents crossed the blood-brain barrier at about the same rate as albumin, suggesting that they cross the blood-brain barrier by way of the extracellular pathways. No saturable component to influx was found, but indirect evidence suggested a brain-to-blood efflux system. The percent of the intravenously injected dose taken up per gram of brain (%Inj/g) ranged from 0.05 to 0.1 %Inj/g among the three erythropoietic agents and peaked about 3 h after IV injection. For other substances, this range of %Inj/g is known to produce direct effects on brain function. We conclude that erythropoietic agents cross the blood-brain barrier by way of the extracellular pathways in amounts that are likely sufficient to explain their neuroprotective effects. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据