4.4 Article

Quaternary structure of the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus main protease

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 43, 期 47, 页码 14958-14970

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi0490237

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) has been one of the most severe viral infectious diseases last year and still remains as a highly risky public health problem around the world. Exploring the types of interactions responsible for structural stabilities of its component protein molecules constitutes one of the approaches to find a destabilization method for the virion particle. In this study, we performed a series of experiments to characterize the quaternary structure of the dimeric coronavirus main protease (M-pro, 3CL(pro)). By using the analytical ultracentrifuge, we demonstrated that the dimeric SARS coronavirus main protease exists as the major form in solution at protein concentration as low as 0.10 mg/mL at neutral pH. The enzyme started to dissociate at acidic and alkali pH values. Ionic strength has profound effect on the dimer stability indicating that the major force involved in the subunit association is ionic interactions. The effect of ionic strength on the protease molecule was reflected by the drastic change of electrostatic potential contour of the enzyme in the presence of NaCl. Analysis of the crystal structures indicated that the interfacial ionic interaction was attributed to the Arg-4...Glu-290 ion pair between the subunits. Detailed examination of the dimer-monomer equilibrium at different pH values reveals apparent pK(a) values of 8.0 +/- 0.2 and 5.0 +/- 0.1 for the Arg-4 and Glu-290, respectively. Mutation at these two positions reduces the association affinity between subunits, and the Glu-290 mutants had diminished enzyme activity. This information is useful in searching for substances that can intervene in the subunit association, which is attractive as a target to neutralize the virulence of SARS coronavirus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据