4.7 Article

Immunoassay to measure ataxia-telangiectasia mutated protein in cellular lysates

期刊

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 50, 期 12, 页码 2302-2308

出版社

AMER ASSOC CLINICAL CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.039461

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS36343] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T) is a neurologic disorder caused by mutations in the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene. A clinical diagnosis of A-T is confirmed by radiosensitivity testing and immunoblotting for ATM protein. Because both of these tests have long turnaround times ( greater than or equal to3 months), we developed a rapid immunoassay to measure ATM protein and determined its sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing A-T. Methods: Recombinant ATM protein was used for standardization. Lysates of lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from A-T patients, controls, and A-T heterozygotes were tested for ATM protein by immunoassay. Results: Between-run imprecision (CV) was:513%. Nuclear lysates from control LCLs and PBMCs had ATM protein concentrations of 49-610 mug/L and 48-943 mug/L, respectively. ATM protein was not detectable in LCL nuclear lysates from 18 of 21 A-T patients. The three remaining A-T patients had trace amounts of ATM protein, which was confirmed on immuoblots. ATM protein was also detectable in whole-cell lysates from 4 X 106 cells at concentrations of 64-463 mug/L and 42-444 mug/L for control LCLs and PBMCs, respectively. A-T heterozygotes had ATM protein concentrations of 52-98 mug/L. ATM protein was stable in PBMCs stored for 1 month at -70 degreesC, but rapidly decreased after 1 day in unprocessed blood. Conclusions: This ATM protein immunoassay can be used to confirm a diagnosis of A-T in 2 days on small numbers of PBMCs and can potentially identify A-T carriers and individuals at increased risk for cancer. (C) 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据