4.3 Article

How a specialist and a non-specialist insect cope with dimethyl disulfide produced by Allium porrum

期刊

ENTOMOLOGIA EXPERIMENTALIS ET APPLICATA
卷 113, 期 3, 页码 173-179

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00216.x

关键词

Acrolepiopsis assectella; Lepidoptera; Acrolepiidae; Allium porrum; Alliaceae; Callosobruchus maculatus; Coleoptera; Bruchidae; detoxification; dimethyl disulfide; glutathione S-transferase; resistance; secondary compounds; spectrophotometry; toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damaged Allium plants produce and release sulfur allelochemicals, presumably to prevent insect herbivory. Defensive sulfur compounds, particularly dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), are highly toxic for non-adapted species. The toxicity of DMDS in these insects is due to disruption of the cytochrome oxidase system of their mitochondria. The purpose of this study was to compare susceptibility to DMDS in a specialist and a non-specialist insect of Allium plants, i.e., Acrolepiopsis assectella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Acrolepiidae) and Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) a specialist insect of Leguminosae. Results showed that A. assectella larvae are less susceptible to DMDS than C. maculatus adults. This bruchid becomes more tolerant after a first exposure to 0.2 mul l(-1) of DMDS, with second-exposure toxicity depending on the time lapse between exposures. Higher second-exposure tolerance could be due to selection and detoxification. To answer this question, the activity of glutathione S-transferase (GST), a key enzyme in the detoxification system, was analyzed after DMDS exposure of C. maculatus adults and larvae and of A. assectella larvae. Exposure to DMDS increased GST activity in C. maculatus adults and larvae. This finding implies that induced GST is involved in C. maculatus tolerance to DMDS. Exposure to DMDS had no effect on GST activity in A. assectella. Adaptations underlying A. assectella tolerance to sulfur compounds are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据