4.1 Article

Facial nerve repair with epineural suture and anastomosis using fibrin adhesive:: An experimental study in the rabbit

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
卷 62, 期 12, 页码 1524-1529

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.216

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: An experimental model in rabbits was used to compare epineural suturing and fibrin adhesive anastomosis for facial nerve repair. Materials and Methods: Thirty-four facial nerves from 17 rabbits were isolated, transected, and anastomosed, with an evaluation of their electrophysiologic and histologic parameters. The rabbits were divided into 2 groups of 5 and 12 animals, respectively: a 10-mm defect was made in the right facial nerve in the first group, with transection and epineural suturing of the left nerve, followed by death after 120 days. This was the control-versus-epineural suture group. In the second group, the right facial nerve was transected and subjected to epineural suturing, while the left nerve was transected and anastomosed using fibrin adhesive. The rabbits were killed 15, 30, 60, and 120 days after the microsurgical procedure. This was the epineural suture-versus-fibrin adhesive group. Results: From day 30, the number of regenerated axons increased with time in the epineural suture and fibrin adhesive anastomotic specimens. Epineural suture showed more regenerated axons and a faster linear rate of regeneration than anastomosis with fibrin adhesive. The reduction in conduction velocity decreased significantly with time with the same linear pattern for both suture techniques. Conclusions: Epineural suturing offered superior performance versus anastomosis with fibrin adhesive in terms of axon count but not in decrease in conduction velocity. (C) 2004 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据