4.3 Article

Conformational sampling and dynamics of membrane proteins from 10-nanosecond computer simulations

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20257

关键词

molecular dynamics; conformational space; phase space; convergence; principal component analysis; covariance analysis; essential dynamics; Debye-Waller B-factors; ergodicity

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/B/16011, B19456, BEP17032] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [B19456, BEP17032, BBS/B/16011] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the current report, we provide a quantitative analysis of the convergence of the sampling of conformational space accomplished in molecular dynamics simulations of membrane proteins of duration in the order of 10 nanoseconds. A set of proteins of diverse size and topology is considered, ranging from helical pores such as gramicidin and small beta-barrels such as OmpT, to larger and more complex structures such as rhodopsin and FepA. Principal component analysis of the C-alpha-atom trajectories was employed to assess the convergence of the conformational sampling in both the transmembrane domains and the whole proteins, while the time-dependence of the average structure was analyzed to obtain single-domain information. The membrane-embedded regions, particularly those of small or structurally simple proteins, were found to achieve reasonable convergence. By contrast, extra-membranous domains lacking secondary structure are often markedly under-sampled, exhibiting a continuous structural drift. This drift results in a significant imprecision in the calculated B-factors, which detracts from any quantitative comparison to experimental data. In view of such limitations, we suggest that similar analyses may be valuable in simulation studies of membrane protein dynamics, in order to attach a level of confidence to any biologically relevant observations. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据