4.4 Article

Developmental time of Melanoplus sanguinipes (Orthoptera: Acrididae) at high latitudes

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL ENTOMOLOGY
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1513-1522

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.6.1513

关键词

thermoregulation; subarctic; phenological model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rates of development of Melanoplus sanguinipes F. from Alaska were determined at eight constant temperatures between 21 and 42degreesC. Diurnally alternating temperatures were used to estimate rates of development at temperatures too low for nymphs to complete development under constant temperatures. Two previously published equations were fit to these data and used to predict developmental rates as a function of temperature. The first equation, nonlinear and only approaching zero rate of development asymptotically, was fit to the data from constant and alternating temperature treatments. The second equation, which included an intercept, was fit to the data from constant temperature treatments only. Estimated developmental times based on these equations were tested against observed developmental times in two fluctuating temperature regimes in growth chambers, and two seasons of field sampling. Elevation of body temperature of grasshoppers above ambient temperatures in the field was modeled as a linear function of solar irradiance, based on field measurements. The effect of behavioral thermoregulation on nymphal developmental times in the field was estimated using standard air temperatures and solar-adjusted temperatures. Rates of development under most of the constant temperature treatments were higher than any previously published for M. sanguinipes. Estimated rates of development in the field using air temperatures only were about one-half those using solar-adjusted temperatures. Observed developmental times in the held were 45 and 42 d in 2000 and 2002, respectively. Because of local adaptation and behavioral thermoregulation, duration of nymphal stages in M. sanguinipes is relatively independent of latitude.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据