4.6 Article

Increased allergen concentration enhances IFN-γ production by allergic donor T cells expressing a peripheral tissue trafficking phenotype

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 59, 期 12, 页码 1308-1317

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00584.x

关键词

adhesion molecule; allergy; chemokine receptor; immune regulation; T cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Clinically effective allergen-specific immunotherapy correlates with decreased circulating allergen-specific IL-4(+) T cells but increased IFN-gamma(+) cells at sites of allergen challenge. Whether immunotherapy promotes trafficking of IFN-gamma(+) T cells to peripheral tissues is unknown. As aeroallergen is administered at higher concentrations during immunotherapy than those encountered naturally, the effect of allergen concentration on adhesion molecule (CD62L and CD49d) and chemokine receptor (CCR3 and CCR5) expression by peripheral-blood T cells was analysed in parallel with cytokine production. Methods: House dust mite-allergic donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells were cultured for 14 days with different allergen concentrations. Cytokine profiles of were analysed by flow cytometry. Results: Cultures stimulated with 100 mug/ml house dust mite extract compared with 1 mug/ml had increased proportions and numbers of CD62L(lo), CD49d(hi) or CCR5(+) T cells expressing IFN-gamma. CCR3-positive CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell numbers were very low and did not differ between cultures. In contrast the proportions of 'peripheral tissue trafficking' CD4(+) T cells expressing IL-4 were decreased in cultures stimulated with high in comparison with low allergen concentration. Conclusion: These results indicate the importance of achieving high allergen doses during immunotherapy to promote IFN-gamma production and expression of a 'peripheral tissue trafficking' phenotype by allergen-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. The net change in cytokine milieu at sites of allergen encounter would then down-regulate clinical manifestations of allergic disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据