4.6 Article

Difference in skeletal muscle function in males vs. females:: role of estrogen receptor-β

期刊

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00098.2004

关键词

skeletal muscle fatigue; gender differences; muscle LIM protein; muscle ankyrin repeat protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Male skeletal muscles are generally faster and have higher maximum power output than female muscles. Conversely, during repeated contractions, female muscles are generally more fatigue resistant and recover faster. We studied the role of estrogen receptor-beta (ERbeta) in this gender difference by comparing contractile function of soleus (mainly slow-twitch) and extensor digitorum longus (fast-twitch) muscles isolated from ERbeta-deficient (ERbeta(-/-)) and wild-type mice of both sexes. Results showed generally shorter contraction and relaxation times in male compared with female muscles, and ERbeta deficiency had no effect on this. Fatigue (induced by repeated tetanic contractions) and recovery of female muscles were not affected by ERbeta deficiency. However, male ERbeta(-/-) muscles were slightly more fatigue resistant and produced higher forces during the recovery period than wild-type male muscles. In fact, female muscles and male ERbeta(-/-) muscles displayed markedly better recovery than male wildtype muscles. Gene screening of male soleus muscles showed 25 genes that were differently expressed in ERbeta(-/-) and wild-type mice. Five of these genes were selected for further analysis: muscle ankyrin repeat protein-2, muscle LIM protein, calsequestrin, parvalbumin, and aquaporin-1. Expression of these genes showed a similar general pattern: increased expression in male and decreased expression in female ERbeta(-/-) muscles. In conclusion, ERbeta deficiency results in increased performance during fatigue and recovery of male muscles, whereas female muscles are not affected. Improved contractile performance of male ERbeta(-/-) mouse muscles was associated with increased expression of mRNAs encoding important muscle proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据