4.1 Article

Ethical dilemmas arising from implementation of the European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice - A descriptive epidemiological study

期刊

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 202-208

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/02813430410006693

关键词

cardiovascular disease; clinical guidelines; ethics; general practice; preventive medicine; risk; sustainability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Our first objective is to describe total, age- and gender-specific prevalences of subjects in a well-defined population for whom medical follow-up is indicated due to unfavourably high blood pressure and/or cholesterol levels, as defined by the 2003 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Our second objective is to highlight scientific questions and ethical dilemmas relating to implementation of the guidelines. Design, setting, and participants-Cross-sectional population study comprising 62 104 adult Norwegians aged 20-79 years who participated in The Nord-Trondelag Health Study 1995-97. Main outcome measures-Total, age- and gender-specific point prevalences of individuals with total cholesterol greater than or equal to5 mmol/ l and/or systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mmHg, or taking antihypertensive medication. Main results-In total, 76% of individuals aged 20-79 years have an unfavourable'' cardiovascular disease risk profile, according to guideline definitions. The point prevalence of individuals with cholesterol and/or blood pressure above the recommended cut-off points increases with age. By age 24, the prevalence reaches 50%. By age 49, it reaches 90%. Men below 50 years of age have higher combined risk prevalence than women. Conclusions and implications-Implementation of the 2003 European guidelines on CVD prevention would label a large majority of Norwegian adults as having unfavourably high cholesterol and/or blood pressure levels. The current biomedical standards appear to invalidate demographic health statistics. The theoretical basis on which the guidelines rest should thereby be scrutinized with regard to scientific methodology and consistency. Important ethical dilemmas arise at the point of guideline implementation, relating to risk labelling and medicalization, as well as resource allocation and sustainability within the healthcare system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据