4.2 Article

Differences in serum Bisphenol A concentrations in premenopausal normal women and women with endometrial hyperplasia

期刊

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
卷 51, 期 6, 页码 595-600

出版社

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.51.595

关键词

Bisphenol A; simple endometrial hyperplasia; complex endometrial hyperplasia; endometrial carcinoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has been raised in relation to its potential for adverse health outcomes. Bisphenol A (BPA) is an estrogenic EDC widely found in plastic products. We determined BPA concentrations in premenopausal women by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and evaluated possible linkage between its contamination levels and endometrial hyperplasia, an estrogen-related disorder of the uterus. It has been implied that higher levels of BPA, which binds to estrogen receptor and plays estrogenic roles may, enhance endometrial hyperplasia. Serum BPA was detectable in all subjects and its concentrations in healthy controls with normal endometrium were 2.5 +/- 1.5 ng/ml (mean +/- SD). BPA levels in patients with simple endometrial hyperplasia with benign nature were 2.9 +/- 2.0 ng/ml and were not significantly different from the controls. Unexpectedly, BPA levels in patients with complex endometrial hyperplasia with malignant potential were 1.4 +/- 0.4 ng/ml and significantly lower compared to both control and simple endometrial hyperplasia groups. In addition, we measured the serum BPA levels in postmenopausal endometrial cancer patient (1.4 +/- 0.5 ng/ml), which were also significantly lower than control and simple endometrial hyperplasia groups. These findings suggest the presence of associations between BPA exposure and complex endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. The mode of action of BPA may be more complex than expected and the contradictory results may serve as a clue to addressing the mechanisms of linkage between occurrence of estrogen-dependent diseases and endocrine disruption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据