4.7 Article

The burden of community-acquired pneumonia in seniors: Results of a population-based study

期刊

CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 39, 期 11, 页码 1642-1650

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/425615

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Pneumonia is recognized as a leading cause of morbidity in seniors. However, the overall burden of this disease - and, in particular, the contribution of ambulatory cases to that burden - is not well defined. To estimate rates of community-acquired pneumonia and to identify risk factors for this disease, we conducted a large, population-based cohort study of persons aged greater than or equal to 65 years that included both hospitalizations and outpatient visits for pneumonia. Methods. The study population consisted of 46,237 seniors enrolled at Group Health Cooperative who were observed over a 3- year period. Pneumonia episodes presumptively identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes assigned to medical encounters were validated by medical record review. Characteristics of participants were defined by administrative data sources. Results. The overall rate of community-acquired pneumonia ranged from 18.2 cases per 1000 person-years among persons aged 65 - 69 years to 52.3 cases per 1000 person-years among those aged greater than or equal to 85 years. In this population, 59.3% of all pneumonia episodes were treated on an outpatient basis. In multivariate analysis, risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia included age, male sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and smoking. Conclusions. On the basis of these data, we estimate that roughly 915,900 cases of community-acquired pneumonia occur annually among seniors in the United States and that similar to 1 of every 20 persons aged greater than or equal to 85 years will have a new episode of community-acquired pneumonia each year.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据