4.6 Article

Inflammation, insulin, and endothelial function in overweight children and adolescents: The role of exercise

期刊

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
卷 145, 期 6, 页码 731-736

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.08.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR00400] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [1 P30 DK 50456-08] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives To assess subclinical inflammation, fasting insulin, and endothelial function before and after exercise in overweight children and adolescents. Study design Twenty-five children (body mass index [BMI] >85th percentile) were assessed for brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), nitroglycerin-induced dilation, C-reactive protein (CRP), lipids, glucose' insulin, oral glucose tolerance, body composition, aerobic fitness (peak oxygen uptake [VO(2)Peak]), and blood pressure. Twenty of these persons were equally and randomly assigned to either 8 weeks of stationary cycling or to a non-exereising control group. Results A baseline correlation was found between CRP and fasting insulin (r = 0.62; P <.001), which remained significant after aqjusting for baseline variables (r = 0.53; P <.05). After 8 weeks, significant improvements were observed in the exercise group compared with the control group for VO(2)peak (exercise group = 21.8 +/- 2.1 to 23.2 +/- 1.5 mL/kg/minute vs control group = 23.4 +/- 1.6 to 20.9 +/- 2.2 mUkg/minute; P <.05), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (exercise group = 1.02 +/- 0.03 to 1.10 +/- 0.04 mmol/L vs control group = 1.08 +/- 0.07 to 0.99 +/- 0.09 mmol/L; P <.05), and FMD area under the curve (AUC) (exercise group = 746 +/- 66 to 919 +/- 94 parts per thousand sec vs control group = 731 +/- 102 to 515 +/- 73 parts per thousand sec; P <.05). Conclusions In overweight children and adolescents, CRP is independently associated with fasting insulin. Eight weeks of aerobic exercise improves fitness, HDL cholesterol, and endothelial function in this group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据