4.6 Article

Visual field changes after cataract extraction: The AGIS experience

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 138, 期 6, 页码 1022-1028

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.006

关键词

-

资金

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R01 EY12738] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that cataract extraction in glaucomatous eyes improves overall sensitivity of visual function without affecting the size or depth of glaucomatous scotomas. DESIGN: Experimental study with no control group. METHODS: One hundred fifty,eight eyes (of 140 patients) from the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study with at least two reliable visual fields within a year both before and after cataract surgery were included. Average mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), and corrected pattern standard deviation (CPSD) were compared before and after cataract extraction. To evaluate changes in scotoma size, the number of abnormal points (P < .05) on the pattern deviation plot was compared before and after surgery. We described an index (scotoma depth index) to investigate changes of scotoma depth after surgery. RESULTS: Mean values for MD, PSD, and CPSD were -13.2, 6.4, and 5.9 dB before and -11.9, 6.8, and 6.2 dB after cataract surgery (P less than or equal to .001 for all comparisons). Mean (+/- SD) number of abnormal points on pattern deviation plot was 26.7 +/- 9.4 and 27.5 +/- 9.0 before and after cataract surgery, respectively (P = .02). Scotoma depth index did not change after cataract extraction -19.3 vs -19.2 dB, P = .90). CONCLUSIONS: Cataract extraction caused generalized improvement of the visual field, which was most marked in eyes with less advanced glaucomatous damage. Although the enlargement of scotomas was statistically significant, it was not clinically meaningful. No improvement of sensitivity was observed in the deepest part of the scotomas. (C) 2004 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据