4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Prospective evaluation of imaging procedures for the detection of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumors in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 1317-1322

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-004-7642-7

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Early identification of pancreaticoduodenal endocrine tumors (PETs) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) is mandatory, because these tumors represent the most common cause of death within the syndrome. The diagnostic value of imaging procedures has therefore been evaluated in a prospective observational study. Between December 1997 and June 2003 twenty-two MEN-I patients with genetically confirmed disease were followed for PETs using a standardized screening program with serum hormone measurements, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), computed tomography (CT), and somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy (SRS). Results could be validated by surgery and histopathology in 13 patients during 18 operations. In 12 asymptomatic patients with tumors measuring 10 mm or less, who have not yet undergone operation, PETs were detected by EUS in 12/12, by CT in 1/12, and by SRS in 2/11 cases. In 13 patients who have undergone 18 surgical explorations EUS, CT, and SRS were true positive in 12 of 16,7 of 13, and 12 of 17 cases, respectively, although the number of tumors detected by each imaging procedure alone was lower than the number detected intraoperatively and histopathologically in almost every case. A solitary liver metastasis in one patient and a nonfunctioning PET recurrence in another were identified only by SRS. Endoscopic untrasonography is the most sensitive imaging procedure for the detection of small (less than or equal to 10 mm) PETs in MEN-1, whereas SRS is the procedure of choice for the identification of metastases of MEN-1 PETs-i.e., for staging. Detection of PETs at an early stage by an aggressive screening program using EUS may lead to prompt surgical intervention and improved prognosis of MEN-I PETs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据