期刊
JOURNAL OF LAW MEDICINE & ETHICS
卷 32, 期 4, 页码 556-+出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2004.tb01961.x
关键词
-
In the debate over the use of litigation to make public health policy. proponents and critics of the litigation disagree over the proper role of courts in policy making. This article examines these arguments and argues that (1) the two sides rely on competing ideals of the proper role of courts drawn from constitutional law, both of which are inapposite to the traditional policy making role of courts in the context of civil litigation and (2) the central argument, of each side require further theoretical elaboration mid empirical support.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据