4.4 Article

Sequence tolerance of the phage λ PRM promoter:: Implications for evolution of gene regulatory circuitry

期刊

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY
卷 186, 期 23, 页码 7988-7999

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.23.7988-7999.2004

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM24178, R01 GM024178] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Much of the gene regulatory circuitry of phage lambda centers on a complex region called the OR region. This similar to100-bp region is densely packed with regulatory sites, including two promoters and three repressor-binding sites. The dense packing of this region is likely to impose severe constraints on its ability to change during evolution, raising the question of how the specific arrangement of sites and their exact sequences could evolve to their present form. Here we ask whether the sequence of a cis-acting site can be widely varied while retaining its function; if it can, evolution could proceed by a larger number of paths. To help address this question, we developed a X cloning vector that allowed us to clone fragments spanning the O-R region. By using this vector, we carried out intensive mutagenesis of the P-RM promoter, which drives expression of CI repressor and is activated by CI itself. We made a pool of fragments in which 8 of the 12 positions in the -35 and -10 regions were randomized and cloned this pool into the vector, making a pool of P-RM variant phage. About 10% of the P-RM variants were able to lysogenize, suggesting that the lambda regulatory circuitry is compatible with a wide range of P-RM sequences. Analysis of several of these phages indicated a range of behaviors in prophage induction. Several isolates had induction properties similar to those of the wild type, and their promoters resembled the wild type in their responses to CI. We term this property of different sequences allowing roughly equivalent function sequence tolerance and discuss its role in the evolution of gene regulatory circuitry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据