4.7 Article

Prognostic significance of tissue transglutaminase in drug resistant and metastatic breast cancer

期刊

CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 23, 页码 8068-8076

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1107

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-16672] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Drug resistance and metastasis pose major impediments in the successful treatment of cancer. We previously reported that multidrug-resistant breast cancer cells exhibit high levels of tissue transglutaminase (TG2; EC 2.3.2.13). Because the drug-resistant and metastatic phenotypes are thought to share some common pathways, we sought to determine whether metastatic breast cancer cells express high levels of TG2. Experimental Design: The metastatic breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and the sublines derived from it were tested for TG2 expression. Similarly, several sublines derived from an immortal but normal breast epithelial cell line, MCF10A, representing various stages in breast cancer progression were studied for TG2 expression. The primary and nodal tumor samples from 30 patients with breast cancer were also studied for TG2 expression. Results: The MDA-MB-231 cells expressed high basal levels of TG2. Two clones derived from this cell line, MDA231/cl.9 and MDA231/cl.16, showed a 10- to 15-fold difference in TG2 level. TG2-deficient MDA231/cl.9 cells exhibited higher sensitivity to doxorubicin and were less invasive than were the TG2-sufricient MDA231/cl.16 cells. The MCF10A-derived sublines had increased TG2 expression as they advanced from noninvasive to an invasive phenotype. Importantly, the metastatic lymph node tumors from patients with breast cancer showed significant higher levels of TG2 expression compared with the primary tumors from the same patients. Conclusions: TG2 expression is up-regulated in drugresistant and metastatic breast cancer cells, and it can serve as a valuable prognostic marker for these phenotypes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据