4.0 Article

Pathobiology, classification, and diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.beha.2004.08.007

关键词

myelodysplastic syndrome; MDS scorfing; IPSS; FAB; WHO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent advances in molecular genetics have advanced the knowledge regarding the mechanisms leading to myelodysplastic syndrome (MIDS), secondary acute myeloid leukemia, and therapy-induced MIDS. Unfavorable cytogenetics associated with this group of disorders includes monosomy or deletion of the long arm of chromosomes 5 or 7, inversions of chromosome 3, translocations, deletions, and trisomies involving several other chromosomes. These unbalanced chromosomal aberrations result in hemizygosity and unmasking of oncogenes, changes in levels of expressed genes, or inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. It is evident that the cytogenetics associated with MIDS is highly complex and heterogeneous, leading to an equally heterogeneous manifestation of the disease. Classifications, initially defined by the French-British-American group followed by the World Health Organization, and now by the International Prognostic Scoring System, have determined prognosis and helped develop treatment strategies for these patients, thus reducing their potential to develop acute leukemia. To date there are seven different prognostic schemas. These are constantly being improved so that MDS patients, who tend to be elderly, can be suitably treated. Additionally, treatment considerations and prognosis are different for patients who develop therapy-related MDS or for the juvenile population than for those with de novo MIDS. The genetic alterations in MIDS bone marrow and blood cells have been identified and possible models have been proposed for the development and progress of MIDS, from the early stage to late-stage MIDS evolving to acute myeloid leukaemia. As the functional mechanisms behind these chromosomal changes are being revealed, new therapies based on these mechanisms are currently being made and tested.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据