4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of somatic development and status of conduit after extracardiac Fontan operation in young and older children

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
卷 26, 期 6, 页码 1073-1079

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.07.021

关键词

Fontan procedure; extracardiac conduit; somatic development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We set out to examine whether the extracardiac Fontan operation (ECFO) in young children is beneficial for the early postoperative course and whether it has a negative impact on the mid-term hemodynamics and growth of the children due to absent growth potential of the prosthetic conduit. Therefore we compared our medium-term experience with ECFO in children under 4 years of age to that in older children regarding the incidence of postoperative complications, somatomotoric development and conduit status. Methods and results: Between 11/95 and 12/02 ECFO was performed in 30 children under 4 years of age and 21 older children aged 4-13 years. There were no deaths in children under 4 years of age and two older children died. No prolonged support (> 72 h) of suprarenin was required in small children compared to 4 older children. In twenty-seven children, who underwent postoperative heart catheterization no pulmonary artery or systemic vein distortion occurred. One re-operation and one transcatheter intervention were performed because of the partial conduit stenosis. During the median follow-up of 4.8 years a manifestly accelerated postoperative weight gain was observed in children operated on under 4 years of age, compared to that in older children (up to the 50 vs. 10th percentile, P < 0.05). Conclusions: The ECFO could be performed in young children with low morbidity and mortality rates. In the majority of patients, implanted prosthetic grafts maintain stable form without the development of stenosis. Accelerated somatic development, especially in small children, is to be observed after completion of the Fontan circulation. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据