4.5 Article

The associations of anxiety, depression and personal illness representations with glycaemic control and health-related quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 57, 期 6, 页码 557-564

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.03.006

关键词

depression; diabetes mellitus; illness perceptions; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: This study examined the interrelationships of anxiety, depression and personal illness representations with glycaemic control and health-related quality of life in adults with Type 2 diabetes. Methods: One hundred eighty-four consecutive patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus completed the Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), the Well-Being Scale (WBQ) and the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36). Demographic characteristics, details of diabetes status (duration of diabetes, treatments and complications) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were recorded. Results: Depression was correlated with greater perceived symptom load (r=.48, P <.01), worse anticipated consequences (r = -41 P <.01) and perceived lack of control of diabetes (r=.28, P<.01). After controlling for demographic and illness characteristics, personal illness representations relating to symptom load and anticipated consequences were independently associated with the SF-36 physical functioning score, contributing an additional 15% to the variance. WBQ depression and anxiety scores, along with IPQ control and consequences, were independently associated with SF-36 mental function score, contributing a further 51% to the variance after controlling for demographic and illness details. Neither IPQ nor WBQ scales were associated with HbA1c after controlling for demographic and medical illness details. Conclusion: Anxiety, depression and negative beliefs about illness influence physical and mental functioning, but not metabolic control in patients with diabetes. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据