4.5 Article

Contribution of the support limb in control of angular momentum after tripping

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 37, 期 12, 页码 1811-1818

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.038

关键词

tripping; falling; angular momentum; external moment; obstacle-foot contact force

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tripping over an obstacle can result in a fall when the forward angular momentum, obtained from impact with the obstacle, is not arrested. Angular momentum can be restrained by proper placement of the recovery limb, anteriorly of the body, but possibly also by a reaction in the contralateral support limb during push-off. The purpose of this study was to quantify the extent to which the support limb contributes to recovery after tripping by providing time and clearance for proper positioning of the recovery limb, and by restraining the angular momentum of the body during push-off. Twelve young adults were repeatedly tripped over an obstacle during mid-swing, while walking over a platform. Kinematics and ground reaction forces at the support limb were measured. Quantification of the angular momentum was based on calculation of the external moment, which equals the rate of change in the angular momentum of the body. Results showed that all subjects acquired a similar increase in angular momentum during foot-obstacle contact, on average 11.4 kg m(2) s(-1). In all subjects, the support limb played a role in recovery after tripping by providing time and clearance for proper positioning of the recovery limb, as indicated by body elevation (6%) and the increased forward pelvis displacement over recovery stride (43%). Almost all subjects were also able to restrain the forward angular momentum of the body during push-off by the support limb. Less angular momentum remained to be further accomplished by the recovery limb. Reductions in the quality of the support limb responses may be among the factors that increase the risk of falling in the elderly. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据